Jongmin Park
Doctoral Candidate
School of Journalism
University of Missouri-Columbia
Sungwook Shim
Masters Student
School of Journalism
University of Missouri-Columbia
Abstract
This study examines the content of political newspaper
comics in presidential elections to compare the culture of the United States
and Korea from three perspectives: (1) the context of communication, (2)
individualism vs. collectivism, and (3) confrontation. It finds a clear
difference between candidate images in the cartoons of America and Korea.
These three dimensions were good indicators of cultural differences between
Western and Asian society.
1. Introduction
Whereas high art was brought to fruition under the patronage of church
or princes, the flowering of caricature has its origins in popular art.
We can learn a great deal more about the life of the people, their customs,
their way of living, dress, and habits, from Holbeinís woodcuts
than from his paintings (Selz, 1976, p.11).
The most popular feature in newspapers is comic strips. They offer humor,
brightening a personís day. The comics are read by seventy-five
percent of newspaper readers (Hughes, 1988, p.27). When editors at
the Houston Chronicle polled readers about the comics, 20,000
readers responded. They paid their own postage, and many readers wrote
long letters to the staffs (p. 27). This response reflects readersí
strong interest in newspaper comics.
Political cartoons also work as an important source of information,
retaining amazing freshness and eliciting an immediate response (Selz,
1976, p.12). They are visual commentaries on political angles and social
satires with a cute punch. Political cartoons mirror a societyís
culture (Gower, 1995, p. 37).
One type of political cartoon is the caricature, a form of wit or satire
usually having a moral purpose. Famous and notorious politicians become
regular subjects in caricatures. For example, this study revealed that
43 percent of USA Today political cartoons in 1996 included caricatures
of presidential candidates Bill Clinton, Bob Dole and Ross Perot. In the
1997 presidential election in Korea, Chosunilbo, a major paper, used caricatures
of presidential candidates in its political satire comic strips every other
day. Thus, media images of presidential candidates are significant
because voters will probably not see the candidate in person and
news coverage of presidential candidates is typically distorted or superficial
it tends to focus only on the "horse race" aspects of the campaigns
(Patterson & McClure, 1976).
Mutual communication among societyís members forms their culture.
Hall (1959) insists that culture and communication are inseparable and
interrelated. His study also suggests a comprehensive conceptual design
based on the notion that culture is communication and communication is
culture. Hall (1977) defined cultural differences by distinguishing
communicative characteristics as concepts of high- or low-context messages.
In another study, Barnlund (1975) proposed that Americans are seen as spontaneous,
talkative and verbally explicit, while Asians are seen as more reserved
and introspective.
As mentioned earlier, it is also known that the mass media of a country
mirrors its cultural values. Researchers have studied the diverse relationship
between media content and the cultural traits of a society. Therefore,
it can be assumed that newspaper political cartoons, an element of media
content, also deliver not only various political contexts but also reflect
socio-cultural trends. Furthermore, the contents of newspaper cartoons
from different countries are significant because they can provide a framework
to understand the cultural discourse of each society.
Therefore, this study examines the contents of political newspaper
cartoons in presidential elections in order to compare the cultural aspects
of political communications in the United States and Korea.
The history of political parties in Korea is relatively short compared
to that of America. However, Korean political loyalties tend to be rooted
in the geographic area in which the party originated, as opposed the policies
the party espouses (Kim, 1998). As shown in Fig.1 (See Appendix), east
and west regionalism has been the unsolved issue in Korean society. On
the other hand, Americans are more interested in issues, policies and party
platforms than in personalities and regionalism.
Several cross-cultural aspects of cartoons were adapted for this study.
The first dimension studied is the difference between presidential images
as portrayed in Korean and American political cartoons. This dimension
is studied by adapting Graber and Weaverís presidential performance
criteria. The second area studied is the tone of cartoons in Korea and
America. It is expected that the tone of American cartoons will be more
negative than Korean cartoons. The final dimension studied is orientation
differences between political cartoons in the two countries. Based on the
cultural traits of both countries, it is expected that Korean cartoons
will be personality-oriented and American comics will be issue-oriented.
2. Political Cartoons in Newspapers
The earliest American political prints come, interestingly enough,
from the hands of eminent political leaders, such as Benjamin Franklinís
"Join or Die" of 1754, shown in many newspapers from Philadelphia to Boston,
or Paul Revereís color engraving, "The Boston Massacre" of 1770,
anti-British propaganda under the guise of a realistic rendering of the
event. Franklin was a printer by trade. Revere was not only a silversmith
but also an engraver (Selz, p.13).
American society then enjoyed an atmosphere in which political cartoons
could flourish. Political caricatures, or cartoons, as they came to be
known in the 19th century, were probable only after certain bases were
achieved basically, the widespread agreement of a norm of beauty
and the mental freedom to detach the symbol from the reality of the person
being satirized, ridiculed or castigated. In addition to these circumstances,
there also had to exist a climate of political freedom, supported by political
stability, that permitted artists or writers to engage in satire (Selz,
p.12).
In the early 20th century, political cartoons in American newspapers
overwhelmed their notorious and cynical satires in any subjects and events
backgrounding the political freedom and the freedom of the press and the
development of newspaper industry. Since Richard Outcaltís smiling
street urchin, "The Yellow Kid," ran in 1896, comic strips and panels have
become universal in American newspapers (Shaw, 1992, p. 4).
Yet, the renaissance of the political cartoon in America during the
last twenty years was certainly unpredictable. The problems facing the
cartoonist have been competition with visual media and the decline of print
media (Selz, p.19). It seemed that the purpose and function of the political
cartoon was a matter of the past. In the past, American daily newspapers
commonly included pages full of comics. However, a new comics format is
used to only illustrate events in modern newspapers.
Whereas political cartoons in American newspapers have declined, the
political cartoons in Korean newspapers during the last ten years have
enjoyed full freedom in choosing topics and objects. The main reason is
the end of the military regime in 1987. Not only the front page but also
the social sections of daily newspapers are dealing with current political
issues without any political pressure and restriction. Korean newspaper
readers also amuse themselves by reading comics that criticize current
social problems.
On the other hand, political comics also help people understand
the political fabric of their country. Politicians use political comics
to gain insight and get feedback from the public. During the last Korean
presidential election in 1997, Hoi Chang Lee, the leader of Grand National
Party, used his caricatures instead of his pictures. He also delivered
150,000 cartoon packets titled "A man of integrity: Hoi Chang Lee," and
"The life story of Hoi Chang Lee and his wife, In Wok Han" (Park and Jung,
28 Nov. 1997). Recently, President Kim published a cartoon book,
"Opening the future with our people," to commemorate his first presidential
anniversary (Kho and Shin, 2 Sep. 1998). Korean newspaper comics not only
mirror the society but also serve as social surveillance of the mass media.
In the 1990s, newspaper comics still have the potential to attract
readers of every age, although the number of comics has dropped as newspapers
have been confronted with the rising cost of newsprint. The comics still
reflect peopleís everyday lives (Astor ,1995, p.39). The potential
influence of comics in society has become more extensive because of new
formats including various interactive abilities in everything from print
to audiotext comics (Zimmerman, 1997, p.20). Comic art, computer-generated
graphics, Internet and audiotext telephone services and news photographs
are used to illustrate American political cartoons (Levine, 1997, p.24).
Not only do newspaper comics affect readers, but readers also influence
newspaper comics.
3. Cross-cultural approach in the United States and Korea
Culture is not as much what people do
and how they express themselves as their knowledge of the potential behaviors
and cognitive maps of their in-group. Familiarity with certain forms of
behavior and ways of thinking make people feel that they belong to a culture
(Von Raffler-Engel, 1988). A broad definition of culture was noted by Levine
(1973) who viewed culture as :
An organized body of rules concerning the ways in which individuals
in a population should communicate with one another, think about themselves
and their environments and behave toward one another and toward objects
in their environments. The rules are not universally or constantly obeyed,
but they are recognized by all and they ordinarily operate to limit the
range of variation in patterns of communication, belief, value and social
behavior in that population. (p.4)
Society, social systems
and culture are interrelated and impact communication. To understand similarities
and differences in communication between cultures, it is necessary to have
a way of talking about how cultures differ.
Gudykunst (1987) describes
the variables by which cultures are different or similar as "dimensions
of sociocultural variability." Sociocultural variability is influenced
by two major factors: ecology (or resources) and history (Gudykunst, 1987).
These dimensions of sociocultural variability affect the specific values
and norms that predominate in different cultures. These values and norms
also allow us to understand why patterns of communication are similar or
different across cultural boundaries. Although there are many dimensions
on which cultures differ, this study focuses on Hallís thought of
high-and low-context culture and Hofstedeís (1983) individualism
versus collectivism. Also, Taylor, Miracle, and Chang (1994) cited confrontation
as criteria for differentiating cultural distinctions between the West
and the East.
(1) High-Context Communication versus Low-Context Communication:
Hallís (1977) high- and low-context notion focuses on
cultural differences in communication. Hall (1976) described the difference
between high- and low-context cultures in the following way:
A high context (HC) communication or message is one in which most of
the information is already in the person, while very little is the coded,
explicit, transmitted part of the message. A low context (LC) communication
is just the opposite; i.e., the mass of the information is vested in the
explicit code.
Hall (1987) observed that the United States is characterized by a low-context culture, whereas Japan and Korea have relatively high-context cultures. Also, Yum (1987) noted the high value of reading nonverbal cues as being characteristic of the Korean culture. Kang (1988) and Gudykunst, Yoon and Nishida (1987) also pointed out the high- context nature of Korean culture, finding indirect and subtle communication to be preferred over the direct and blunt style more valued in the West. In a low-context culture, most information is contained in either explicit or verbal messages. Consequently, whereas Korean culture is a high-context culture, American culture is placed on the low-context culture (Gudykunst & Kim, 1992).
(2) Individualism versus Collectivism:
The characteristic of individualism or collectivism is the major
dimension of cultural variability used to explain cross-cultural differences
in behavior. Emphasis is placed on individual goals in individualistic
cultures. Group goals have precedence over individualistic goals in collectivistic
cultures (Tak, Kaid, and Lee, 1997).
Hoare and Pares (1988) indicated that Koreans highly value dependency.
This is evidenced by Koreanís willingness to rely more on extended
families for emotional, social and economic support than Americans. Both
Paik (1968) and Kim (1984,1985) also noted that individuals have
not been the central unit of social life in traditional Korean society.
Instead, a spirit of mutual assistance and cooperation among groups
prevails, manifesting itself in cooperation among rural and urban dwellers.
The Korean people are typically willing to "pitch in" for the good of their
country.
Hofstede (1980, 1983) also compared the collectivistic nature
of Japanese and Korean cultures to the United States. He noted that collectivistic
cultures prefer "a tightly knit social structure in which individuals
can expect other in-group persons to look after them." Collectivism implies
dependence or interdependence, and individualism implies independence.
In the United States, individualistic and independent behaviors are highly
valued, whereas dependency often has a negative connotation.
(3) Confrontation:
Yum (1987) characterized the Korean communication style as being
"accommodation-oriented" as opposed to confrontation-oriented. Paik (1968)
and others have also noted that the traditional face-to-face consciousness
of Koreans makes confrontation in social interaction generally unpleasant.
Hall and Hewitt (1973) suggest that Americans regard communication as a
tool for conflict resolution. The Korean view, however, holds that communication
is of limited value in solving problems because truth and solutions become
apparent in the natural course of events. Thus, Korean people tend to avoid
confrontation. In general, Koreans are more emotion-oriented than Americans,
who place greater emphasis on rationality.
4. Other studies of media coverage in presidential elections
Hacker, et. al. (1996, p.143) studied the use of computer-mediated
political communication in the 1992 presidential campaign . They found
that the reasons voters used computer lists for presidential candidates
in 1992 were: (a) to state opinions about the election, (b) to convey information
about their personal lives and voting aims, and (c) to announce information
about the campaign. The Perot list was found to include more opinion statements
than the other two lists. The Clinton list contained the most information,
including personal facts.
Graber and Weaver (1996, p. 24) also analyzed the presidential election
in 1992 . They classified a list of print media terms that were used to
depict the three candidates in election campaign stories. They found that
40 percent of the characterizations mentioned the overall political doctrine
of the candidates, which were liberal, conservative or moderate. Little
mention was made of candidatesí backgrounds, intellect, motives,
styles of leadership, or how they handled communications, decision-making
and management functions.
In addition, the two terms that had the highest story counts were "strong,"
which referred to the power of candidates, and "trust," which referred
to the personal quality of being faithful. "Strong" accounted for 26 percent
and "trust" accounted for 25 percent of the most frequently used terms.
Finally, "failure," a term used mainly to describe the Bush campaign and
presidency, accounted for nine percent of the most frequently used terms
(pp. 27-28).
Kim (1998) studied Korean voting manners in the 1997 national election.
He found that the candidatesí political party affiliations, which
is the rational, was included in the irrational aspect for evaluating the
candidates. This study shows that Korean people tend to depend on candidatesí
personal orientations, not issues.
Tak, Kaid and Lee (1997) studied cross-cultural dimensions of political
advertising in the United States and Korea. Based upon cultural differences
in the two countries, it was concluded that Korean candidates rely significantly
less on direct negative ads than U.S. candidates. Their findings indicate
that political advertising messages by American and Korean candidates were
highly reflective of their cultural orientations. Political advertising,
therefore, was a conspicuous indicator of cultural values because it reflected
clear differences in American and Korean cultural patterns.
Graber and Weaver (1996, p.7) developed a list of performance criteria
by which to predict or attribute the success or defeat of presidencies
(see Table 1). Using these criteria, they analyzed the content of eight
newspapers and three magazines in America. They found that magazines and
newspapers focused more heavily on judging the motives and personalities
of candidates than on inquiring into the candidatesí backgrounds,
intellects, relationships, communication styles, political styles, decision-making
styles or management skills. Bill Clintonís "honesty" was referred
to a total of 93 times, and his "patriotism" was referred to 89 times.
The most repeated term used about George Bush was "national loyalty." The
next terms were "family" and "traditional values." The most frequently
used term for judging Ross Perot was "crusading personality," and there
were 19 references to "ambition" as the basis of his motivation (p. 23).
Table 1. Presidential Performance Criteria (p.20-21)
Criteria Biographical Adjectives
Background Religious, Educated, Ethical, Career Politician, Disciplined
Intellect Observant, Intelligent, Knowledgeable, Analytical
Motivation Patriotic, Freedom, Competitive, Family/Traditional Values,
Ambitious
Personality Crusading, Commanding, Responsible, Optimistic, Humble,
Loyal, Confident, Enthusiastic, Honest
Relationships Isolated, Diplomatic, Compassionate
Communication Style Elitist, Populist, Eloquent, Image Builder
Leadership Skill Inspirational, Compromising, Charismatic, Persuasive
Political Style Conciliatory, Pragmatic, Reformer, Moralistic, Coalition
Builder
Decision Style Indecisive, Realistic, Passive, Imaginative
Management Skills Delegating, Accountable, Competent, Efficient
6. Research hypotheses
The purpose of this study is to determine the differences between presidential
images in the political cartoons of Korea and America. A content analysis
will accomplish a cross-cultural comparative analysis. Based upon the assumption
of cultural differences between the two countries such as low- and high-context
communication, individualism versus collectivism, and confrontation, both
countriesí images of presidential candidates in newspaper
cartoons will be compared. The following hypotheses are presented.
Several researchers such as Hoare and Pares (1988), Paik (1968), Kim(1984,1985),
Hofstede (1980,1983), Tak, Kaid and Lee (1997) concluded that Korean culture
is collective-oriented and American culture is individual-oriented. Based
on this premise, the first group of hypotheses is made. The categories
for more detailed analysis are adapted from Graber and Weaverís
presidential performance criteria (see Table 1).
Hypothesis 1-a,b,c,d,e,f,g,h,i,j. Korean newspaper cartoons will be
different from American cartoons in terms of presidential candidatesí
background, intellect, motivation, personality, relationships, communication
style, leadership style, political style, decision style and management
skills.
The second hypothesis is based on Hallís (1977) cultural differentiation
between communication contexts. The U.S. is characterized by low-context
communication. Low-context communication individuals are more able to disconnect
the debate from the persons involved they can scream and shout out
a controversy and yet remain good friends afterward. In the high-context
culture, the difference is heavily linked to the person who causes the
contention. To disagree with somebody in public is an extreme insult. Especially
when communicating in a boss-subordinate relationship, individuals are
expected to show mutual sensitivity appropriate to the rituals surrounding
senior-junior relations (Mooij & Keegan, 1991).
Whereas the content of American newspaper contents is expected to express
conflict or open dissatisfaction about presidential candidates, Korean
newspaper comics are expected to reflect their high-context culture and
describe presidential candidates more indirectly.
Hypothesis 2. American newspaper cartoons will use a more negative tone in presenting presidential candidatesí images than will Korean political cartoons.
Digital thinking and decision-making are features of the American communication
system. Whereas Americans are structural and analytical, Koreans are involved
in recognizing the feeling of the overall situation before looking at details
(Mooij & Keegan, 1991). Yum (1987) characterized the Korean communication
style as being "accommodating" as opposed to confrontational. Koreans
will therefore regard a candidateís personality traits, such as
honesty, responsibility and confidence, as more important criteria than
their political positions on issues.
Hypothesis 3. Korean newspaper cartoons will put more emphasis on personality-oriented
contexts than issue-oriented contexts of presidential candidatesí
performance than American cartoons.
7. Research methods
(1) Newspaper Comics Sample
This study will focus on the presidential images in newspaper comics
from Korea and America. The latest Korean presidential election was on
December, 18, 1997. The three candidates were Hoi Chang Lee,
Dae Jung Kim and In Jae Rhee. Hoi Chang Lee led the ruling party, and Dae
Jung Kim led the first opposition party. In Jae Rhee led another opposition
party. The latest American presidential election was November, 2, 1996.
The candidates were Bill Clinton, Bob Dole and Ross Perot. Because of the
proximity of these two elections, the political cartoon coverage of these
two nations will be compared.
This study used only daily cartoons that appeared in the American newspaperUSA
Today and the Korean newspaperChosunilbo . These two newspapers were
selected because they had the highest national circulation in their respective
countries. The coverage period for USA Today was from November 1,
1995 to November 30, 1996. The coverage period for Chosunilbo was
from October 1, 1996 to October 31, 1997. The comics were on page two of
Chosunilbo and on the editorial page of USA Today . The monitored
period of two days per week, Monday and Wednesday, was randomly selected.
Totol 192 cartoons from both newspapers; each 96 cartoons from USA Today
and Chosunilbo were collected and each 96 cartoons. A content analysis
was used to study the cartoons.
Each category was coded whether it was expressed or not. In measuring
the tone of the presidential image, coders judged whether it was largely
positive, negative or neutral. Coders were also told to judge whether the
comics were personality-oriented or issue-oriented.
A chi-square was run to determine whether the presidential images and
the tone of the cartoons in Korean and American newspapers were different.
A chi-square was also used to determine whether the cartoons of the two
countries were personality-oriented or issue- oriented.
(2) Operational definitions
The tone of presidential candidate's image
The negative tone of a presidential candidate's image was coded if
an effort was made to diminish the image of the president through satire,
ridicule, or castigation and when cartoons portrayed the subject in a negative
light or criticized their image in the campaign. On the other hand, the
tone was coded positive if cartoons focused on achievement or praised a
candidateís image in the campaign. In addition, the tone was coded
neutral when cartoons contained neither positive nor negative aspects.
Personal-oriented and issue-oriented
While cartoons were personal-oriented when they described candidates
as individuals, referring attributes such as honesty, intelligence,
sincerity, strength and so on (Garramone, 1986), cartoons referring to
policies advocated by a candidate and future behavior were coded as issue-oriented
(Geiger and Reeves, 1991).
Presidential performance criteria
The categories for this study were adapted from other content analyses
of presidential performance criteria that Graber and Weaver developed.
They developed lists of performance criteria to which over 100 biographers
attributed the victory or defeat of presidential races. Based on their
criteria, the categories are defined operationally:
Background: refers to the presidential candidateís education,
work experience and ethics.
Communication style: refers to the way presidential candidates communicate
with other people.
Decision style: involves the style of making decisions, as depicted
in comics.
Intellect: refers to intellectual capabilities and knowledge about
surroundings and policies.
Leadership skills: refers to presidential candidates selling their
visions or to manage their staffs.
Motivation: refers to the inner drives toward the presidency.
Management style: refers to the presidential candidateís ability
to manage their parties.
Personality: refers to personal style traits like curiosity, honesty,
intelligence, and strength and so on.
Political style: refers to the ability to bargain, to wheel and deal
and make concessions with other candidates and organizations as depicted
in comics.
Relationship: refers to traits and talents that allow the presidential
candidate to develop sound relationships with people inside their parties
and with media as depicted in comics (Graber and Weaver, 1996, p.11).
Cartoons were categorized according to their words and visual images.
Figure 2 and 3 in the appendix are examples classified by the categories
for this study. As shown in Fig. 2, a cartoon in Chosunilbo on Feb.
6,1997, was coded negatively on the tone of the presidential image. It
was also coded issue-oriented because it dealt with an important political
event. Also it included political style and management style among the
presidential performance criteria.
As for a cartoon in USA Today on April 29, 1996 (See Figure 3), the
presidential image took a positive tone for Bob Dole. It also was
coded personality-oriented because it was categorized as using personality
and relationship of the presidential performance criteria.
The three coders were trained to extract the connotative meaning of
comics.
(3) Coders and reliability
The newspaper comics were coded by trained coders who are proficient
in Korean and English. Three coders (a Korean doctoral student in a U.S.
journalism school, a Korean- American undergraduate who is proficient
in Korean and an American journalist who had work experience at a Korean
newspaper) underwent two training sessions. The initial session explained
the coding system and categories; the second session reinforced the category
definitions and clarified problem categories or definitions. Intercoder
reliability, using Holstiís formula (Wimmer and Dominick, 1997,
p. 128), yielded an average intercoder reliability of 83 percent.
8. Findings and Results
Hypothesis 1-a. Korean newspaper cartoons will be different from American
cartoons in terms of presidential candidatesí backgrounds.
As Table 2 indicates, there is no statistical significance in the presentation of candidatesí backgrounds between Korean and American cartoons. Overall, however, Americans deal with candidatesí backgrounds more than Koreans. This result indicates that Americans regard the ethics of candidates as important but that Koreans tend to be more toleratant of ethical problems.
Hypothesis 1-b. Korean newspaper cartoons will be different from American cartoons in terms of presidential candidatesí intellect.
There is no statistical significance in the depiction of candidatesí
intellect between Korean and American cartoons. They deal with candidatesí
intellect similarly. When considering the property of comics, intellect
in comics is not presented more often (see Table 2).
Hypothesis 1-c. Korean newspaper cartoons will be different from American
cartoons in terms of presidential candidatesí motivation.
As shown in Table 2, there is no statistical significance in the presentation
of candidatesí motivations between Korean and American newspapers.
However, motivation is more frequent in Korea than America.
Hypothesis 1-d. Korean newspaper cartoons will be different from American
cartoons in terms of presidential candidatesí personalities.
There is a statistically significant difference in the presentation of
a candidateís personality between Korea and America. As shown in
Table 2, analysis of the data concerning personality found that a larger
percentage (71.4%) of Korean cartoons included personality, with a smaller
percentage (28.6%) in American newspapers. This finding shows that Korean
newspaper cartoons addressed candidatesí personalities significantly
more often. Because of the Korean tendency to avoid confrontation, candidatesí
personalities are more common than in America. This is consistent with
Hypothesis 3.
Hypothesis 1-e. Korean newspaper cartoons will be different from American
cartoons in terms of presidential candidatesí relationships.
There is a significant difference in the depiction of candidatesí
relationships between Korean and American cartoons. As shown in Table 2,
a larger percentage (65.2%) of Korean newspaper cartoons presented candidatesí
relationships. A smaller percentage (34.8%) of America newspaper cartoons
fell into this category. This finding shows that Korean newspaper
comics presented candidatesí relationships significantly more often.
This result indicates that Koreans consider relationships such
as regionalism, school relations and kinship important factors. They also
support assertions about Koreaís social collectivism and that Koreans
value dependency and prefer "a tightly knit social structure in which individuals
can expect other in-group persons to look after them." On the other hand,
in America, individualistic and independent behaviors are more highly valued.
Hypothesis 1-f. Korean newspaper cartoons will be different from American
cartoons in terms of presidential candidatesí communication
styles.
There is no statistically significant difference in the depiction
of candidatesí communication style between Korean and American cartoons.
Moreover, the percentages of presentations of candidatesí
communication styles in both Korea and America are lower than expected
(see Table 2).
Hypothesis 1-g. Korean newspaper cartoons will be different from American
cartoons in terms of presidential candidatesí leadership styles.
As shown in Table 2, there is no statistically significant difference
in the presentation of candidatesí leadership skills in Korean and
American newspaper cartoons.
Hypothesis 1-h. Korean newspaper cartoons will be different from American
cartoons in terms of presidential candidatesí political styles.
There is no statistically significant difference in the presentation
of candidatesí political style between Korean and American cartoons,
as shown in Table 2. However, larger percentages of Korean newspaper cartoons
(64.5%) and smaller percentages of America newspaper cartoons (37.3%) presented
candidatesí political styles.
Hypothesis 1-i . Korean newspaper cartoons will be different from American
cartoons in terms of presidential candidatesí decision-making
styles.
There is no statistically significant difference in references to candidatesí
decision-making styles in Korean and American cartoons. Overall, the newspaper
cartoons of the two countries showed low percentage on decision style (see
Table 2).
Hypothesis 1-j. Korean newspaper cartoons will be different from American
cartoons in terms of presidential candidatesí management skills.
As Table 2 indicates, there is no statistically significant difference
in reference to candidatesí management styles in Korean and American
cartoons. However, a larger percentage (40.5%) of Korean newspaper cartoons
presented candidatesí management style than American newspaper (25.4%).
This indicates that Korean presidential candidatesí management styles
are consequential. This is because the collectivism-oriented system in
Korean political parties emphasizes membersí mutual assistance and
cooperation .
Table 2. Presentation of categories between two countries
America(%) Korea(%)
Background Yes
No
c2=3.08 (df=1); p=n.s 18(30.5)
41(69.5) 13(17.6)
61(82.4)
Intellect Yes
No
c2=.013 (df=1); p=n.s 10(16.9)
49(83.1) 12(16.2)
62(83.8)
Motivation Yes
No
c2=1.59 (df=1); p=n.s 4(6.8)
55(93.2) 10(13.5)
64(86.5)
Personality Yes
No
c2=9.78 (df=1); p<.05 16(27.1)
43(72.9) 40(54.1)
34(45.9)
Relationship Yes
No
c2=5.33 (df=1); p<.05 24(40.7)
35(59.3) 45(60.8)
29(39.2)
Communication
Style Yes
No
c2=1.80 (df=1); p=n.s 17(28.8)
42(71.2) 14(18.9)
60(81.1)
Leadership Skill Yes
No
c2=.342 (df=1); p=n.s 22(37.3)
37(62.7) 24(32.4)
50(67.6)
Political Style Yes
No
c2=3.71 (df=1); p=n.s 22(37.3)
37(62.7) 40(54.1)
34(45.9)
Decision Style Yes
No
c2=.81 (df=1); p=n.s 15(25.4)
44(74.6) 14(18.9)
60(81.1)
Management Style Yes
No
c2=3.36 (df=1); p=n.s 15(25.4)
44(74.6) 30(40.5)
44(59.5)
Hypothesis 2. Compared to Korean newspaper cartoons, American cartoons will use a more negative tone concerning presidential candidatesí images.
There is a significant difference in depiction of presidential candidatesí
images in Korean and American cartoons. This finding indicates that American
newspaper cartoons use a more negative tone concerning candidatesí
images. Table 3 shows that a larger percentage of American candidates (69.5%)
were depicted negatively than Korean candidates (37.8%). Overall, depiction
in a negative tone (51.9%) was highest, and neutral depictions were second
highest. Therefore, the negative aspect is stronger than all the other
aspects in both countryís political cartoons.
Furthermore, America is defined as a low-context culture. Not only
do Americans convey most information in outspoken messages, but they also
freely
express their viewpoints. Therefore, American newspaper cartoons use more
negative tones concerning presidential candidatesí images. Korean
comics depict candidatesí images indirectly and subtly because Korea
is defined as a high-context culture. This leaves the tone of cartoons
in Korea mostly neutral.
Table 3. Nation and the tone of a presidential candidatesí images
America(%) Korea(%)
Positive 7(11.9) 10(13.5)
Negative 41(69.5) 28(37.8)
Neutral 11(18.6) 36(48.6)
c2= 14.78 (df=2) p<.05
Hypothesis 3. Compared to American newspaper cartoons, Korean cartoons will put more emphasis on personality-oriented aspects than issue-oriented aspects of the presidential candidatesí performances.
The results of the analysis show that Korean newspaper cartoons emphasize
more personality more than issue. As shown in Table 4, a larger percentage
of Korean newspaper comics (77%) emphasizes personality than American cartoons
(57.6%). However, both American and Korean newspaper comics emphasized
personality-oriented cartoons.
The Korean communication style is described as being accommodation-oriented
rather than confrontation-oriented. Direct confrontation in Korea is treated
as a blatant disregard of custom. Therefore, it seems that Korean
newspapers are personality-oriented to avoid directly confrontational issues.
In addition to this, Koreans tend to pay more attention to a person than
an issue. This is because the Korean people tend to be more interested
in what a person stands for than in what the party pursues. The politics
of Korea has followed the principle of centering on a person rather than
a party. Both American and Korean newspaper comics emphasize personality-oriented
cartoons. The reason is the nature of cartoons lends themselves to images
rather than complex issues.
Table 4. Nation and Orientation
America Korea
Personality-oriented 34(57.6) 57(77.0)
Issue-oriented 25(42.4) 27(23.0)
c2= 5.72 (df=1) p<.05
9. Conclusion
This study analyzed the images of presidential candidates in newspaper
comics of both Korea and America in terms of the three cultural dimensions.
These were ¨ the context of communication, * individualism vs. collectivism
and Æ confrontation. This study found that these dimensions mirror
the cultural differences of the two countries.
Regarding the tone of a presidential candidateís image in cartoons,
the context of communication was a good indicator of cultural differences.
In the low-context culture of America, most information is delivered directly,
even combatively. Therefore, American newspaper cartoons use a more negative
tone than Korean cartoons. On the other hand, in the high-context culture
of Korea, candidates are depicted subtly and indirectly. This makes the
tone of Korean cartoons neutral.
Individualism vs. collectivism was another good determinant of cultural
differences, according to the study. The results indicate that relationships
such as regionalism, school relations and kinship are important factors
in Korean culture. This highlights the assertion that collectivism and
dependency are highly valued in Korea. There is a clear preference for
"a tightly knit social structure of interdependency." On the other hand,
individualism and independence are highly regarded in America.
Confrontation was also found to be a good indicator of different cultural
patterns. Being accommodating rather than confrontational is characteristic
of Korean communication. Koreans treat direct confrontation as a blatant
disregard of custom. Therefore, the presidential images in Korean newspaper
cartoons are personality-oriented and avoid political issues. In addition
to this, Koreans tend to pay more attention to a person than an issue.
This is because the Korean people tend to be more concerned with the person
than what policies the candidateís party holds. Another reason that
both American and Korean newspaper cartoons emphasize personality more
than issues is the visual nature of comics. That is, cartoons can explore
images better than they can define complex issues.
Also, a clear difference was found regarding presidential candidatesí
images in American and Korean cartoons. The three dimensions were good
indicators of cultural differences between Western and Asian society.
In addition to the cultural differences, the political environments
of the two countries are different and could affect this study. Untested
variables include the roles that economy and education could play.
References
Astor, David (1995), " A look at the state of comics as they enter their second century," Editor & Publisher, 128, 39.
Barnlund, D. (1975), Public and Private Self in Japan and the U.S. Forest Greene, OR: International Scholarly Book Service.
Blaisdell, Jr, T. C. and Selz, P. (1976), The American Presidency in Political Cartoons: 1776-1976. University Art Museum, Berkeley.11-20.
Garramone, G. (1986). Candidate image formation: the role of information processing. In L.L. Kaid, D. Nimmo, & K.K. Sanders (Eds.) New perspectives on political advertising (pp. 235-247). Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
Geiger S.F., & Reeves B. (1991). The effects of visual structure and content emphasis on the evaluation and memory for political candidates. In Biocca, F. (Ed.). Television and political advertising: vol. 1. psychological process (pp. 125 - 143). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Gower, Dan L. (1995), "Health-related content in daily newspaper comic strips: a content analysis with implications for health education," Education, 116(1), 37.
Graber, Doris and Weaver, David (1996), " Presidential Performance Criteria: The missing element in election coverage," Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 1,7-32.
Gudykunst, W. (1987), "Cross-cultural comparisons," In C. Berger & S. Chaffee (Eds.), Handbook of Communication Science (pp. 847-889). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Gudykunst, W., and Kim, Y.Y. (1992), Communication with strangers: A approach to international communication (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Gudykunst, W.B., Yoon, Y. C. , & Nishada, Y. C. (1987), "The influence of individualism collectivism on perceptions of communication in ingroup and outgroup relationships. Communication Monographs, 54, 295 - 306.
Hacker, et.al. (1996), " Uses of computer-mediated political communication in the 1992 presidential campaign: a content analysis of the Bush, Clinton and Perot computer lists," Communication Research Reports, 13, 138-146.
Hall, E.T. (1959), The Silent Language. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
Hall, E.T. (1977), Beyond Culture. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
Hall, E.T. and Hall, M.R. (1987), Hidden Differences : Doing business with the Japanese. Garden City, NY: Anchor Press / Doubleday.
Hall, E.T. and Hewitt, J. P. (1973), The quasi-theory of communication and the management of dissent. In M.H. Prosser (Ed.), Intercommunication Among Nations and Peoples (pp. 530-540). New York: Harper & Row.
Harrison, T.M., Stephen, T.D., Husson, W., & Fehr, B.J. (1991), "Images versus issues in the 1984 presidential election: Difference between men and women," Human Communication Research, 18.
Hofstede, G. (1980), Cultureís Consequences : International differences in work-related values. Beverly Hills : Sage.
Hofstede,G. (1983), Dimensions of national cultures in fifty countries and three regions. In J. Deregowski, S. Dziurawiec & R. Annis (Eds.), Explorations in cross-cultural psychology (pp. 365-397). Lisse, Netherlands: Swets and Zeitlinger.
Hoare, J. & Pares, S. (1988), "Korea: An Introduction," New York : Kegan Paul International.
Hughes, K.A. (1988, June 15), "Zowie: newspapers poll readers on comic strips," Wall Street Journal, p. 27.
Johnson, et.al. (1996), "Turning the spotlight inward: How five leading news organizations covered the media in the 1992 presidential election," Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 73, 660-667.
Kang, S. P. (1988), "Korean culture, the Seoul olympics, and world order," Korea and World Affairs, 347- 362.
Kho, H.G. and Shin, Y. L. (1998), "The publication of president Kim," Joongangilbo, 2 Sept. Seoul.
Kim, K. D. (1984), Man and society in Koreaís economic growth. Seoul: Seoul National University Press.
Kim, H. E. (1985), Korea: Beyond the hills. Seoul: Samhwa Publishing Co.
Kim, H. K.(1998), "Voting Behavior in the 15th National Election in Korea: An Application of Elaboration Likelihood Model," Sungkok Journalism Review, Vol. 8. 5-28.
Levine, Nes (1997), " A unique blend of traditional comic art, news photography, computer special effects, graphics and an Internet and audiotext phone service," Design, 62, 24.
Miller, A.H., Wattenberg, M.P., & Malanchuk, O. (1985), "Cognitive representations of candidate assessment," In K. R. Sanders, L.L. Kaid, & D. Nimmo (Eds.), Political Communication Yearbook 1984, Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
Miller, A.H., Wattenberg, M.P., & Malanchuk, O. (1986), " Schematic assessments of presidential candidates," American Political Science Review, 80.
Mooij, M.K., & Keegan, W.J. (1991), Advertising worldwide: concepts, theories, and practice of international, multinational, and global advertising, Prentice Hall International Ltd.,73-91.
Orman, John (1995), " Images of the presidency in the periodical press," Presidential Studies Quarterly, 25, 683-689.
Paik, H. K. (1968), "The Korean social structure and its implications for education," The Korea Journal, 8, 7-17.
Park, J.G., and Jung, Y.G. (1997), "The media strategy for the presidential campaign," Dongailbo, 28 Nov. Seoul.
Rhee, Jang-Han (1985), "American newspaper coverage of news on relations between Korea and Japan: a content analysis," M.A. Thesis, University of Missouri.
Sanders, K.R., & Pace, T.J. (1977), "The influence of speech communication on the image of political candidates: Limited effects revised," Communication Yearbook, 1.
Shaw, Michael (1992), "Who calls the toons? a Q-methodological study of cartoonistsí and readersí attitudes toward newspaper comics," M.A. Thesis, University of Missouri, 4.
Stewart, D.W., and Furse, D.H. (1986), Effective Television Advertising: A study of 1000 commercials. Lexington, MA: D. C. Health.
Tak J., Kaid, L. L., and Lee, S. (1997), "A cross-cultural study of political advertising in the United States and Korea," Communication Research, Vol. 24 No. 4, August 1997, 413-430.
Taylor, C. R. , Miracle G. E. , & Chang K. Y. (1994), "The difficulty of standardizing international advertising : Some propositions and evidence from Japanese, Korean, and U.S. television advertising," Global and Multinational Advertising , 171-191
Trent, et.al. (1993), " The Ideal Candidates: A study of the desired attributes of the public and the media across two presidential campaigns," American Behavioral Scientist, 37, 225.
Von Raffler-Engel, W. (1988), "The impact of covert factors in cross-cultural communication," In F. Poyatos (Ed,) Cross-cultural Perspectives in Nonverbal Communication (pp. 71-104). Toronto: C.J. Hogrefe.
Yum, J.O. (1987), Korean philosophy and communication. In D.L. Kincaid (Ed.), Communication Theory From Eastern and Western Perspectives (pp. 71-86). New York: Academic Press.
Zimmerman, Bill (1997), " The news in comics (Newdayís Comics
on the news)," Design, 62, 20.
Appendix
Figure 1. Cartoon (Korea)
Sowing or Sewing East and West Regionalism?
Jan 28, 1999
Copyright 1999 JoongAng Ilbo, JoongAng Ilbo New Media Inc.
President Kim Dae Jung is trying to repair the historical rift between
eastern and western portions of the country.
Figure 2. Cartoon (Korea)
I got it ?
Feb 6, 1997
Copyright © 1990 Digital Chosunilbo All rights reserved
Even though the rumor spread that the President, Kim Young Sam, and
the presidential candidate, Kim Dae Jung, were bribed, they didnít
accept it. And they assert that their staff received the bribe.
Figure 3. Cartoon (America)
April 29, 1996
By Michael Ramirez, Memphis Commercial Appeal for USA Today
1. Demographic characteristics
Table 4. Candidates
Candidates Frequency(percent)
Hoi Chang Lee 21(15.8%)
Dae Jung Kim 35(26.3)
In Jae Rhee 18(13.5)
Bill Clinton 35(26.3)
Bob Dole 19(14.3)
Ross Perot 5(3.8)
Total 133
The frequency of Dae Jung Kim is highest (26.3%) in Korea. Bill
Clinton (26.3%) was mentioned most in America.
Table 5. Nation
Nation Frequency(percent) of presidential image
Korea 74(55.6%)
America 59(43.6)
Total 133
Table 6. Tone of Presidential Image
Tone Frequency(percent)
positive 17(12.8)
negative 69(51.9)
neutral 47(35.3)
Total 133
Overall, a negative depiction of the presidential candidatesí
images was highest (51.9%).
Table 7. Presidential Performance Criteria
Presidential Performance Criteria Frequency
Background 24(18%)
Intellect 4(3)
Motivation 7(5.3)
Personality 11(8.3)
Relationship 25(18.8)
Communication Style 11(8.3)
Leadership Skill 12(9)
Political Style 17(12.8)
Decision Style 13(9.8)
Management Style 9(6.8)
Total 133
The percent of relationship (18.8%) is highest in presidential
performance criteria categories. The next are background (18%),
political style (12.8%) and decision style (9.8%).
Table 8. Candidates and Categories
(%)
backg-round intellect motiv-ation perso-nality relatio-ship com.
style leadership political style decision style mana-gement
H.C
Lee 12.9% 18.2% 7.1% 21.4% 20.3% 15.2% 14.5% 24.4%
D.J
Kim
25.8% 27.3% 14.3% 30.4% 30.4% 22.6% 30.4% 35.5% 24.1% 31.3%
I.J
Lee 3.2% 9.1% 50% 19.6% 14.5% 22.6% 6.5% 14.5% 24.1% 11.1%
Bill
Cliton 38.7% 22.7% 17.9% 14.5% 32.3% 34.8% 25.8% 41.4% 22.2%
Bob
Dole 16.1% 9.1% 21.4% 10.7% 17.4% 9.7% 10.9% 8.1% 10.3% 8.9%
Ross
Perot
3.2% 13.6% 7.1% 2.9% 12.9% 2.2% 1.6% 2.2%
For Hoi Chang Lee, the percentage of management (24.4%) is highest.
The percentage of political style (35.5%) is highest for Dae Jung Kim.
The percentage of motivation (50%) is highest for In Jae Rhee. In the case
of America, Bill Clinton is pictured with leadership skill (34.8%), Bob
Dole is pictured with motivation (21.4%) and Ross Perot is pictured with
intellect (13.6%).